Advantage of science Essay Example for Free

Advantage of science Essay Science gives us safe food, free from harmful bacteria, in clean containers or hygienic tins. It also teaches us to eat properly, indicating a diet balanced in protein and carbohydrate and containing vitamins. The results is freedom from disease and prolonged life. In pre-scientific days, food was monotonous and sometimes dangerous; today it is safe and varied. It is varied because through improved sea, land and air transport food can now be freely imported and exported. Science has also improved clothing and made it more appropriate for climatic and working conditions. Man-made fibers and versatile spinning machines, today enable us to dress in clothes both comfortable and smart without being expensive. Home, school and office all bear witness to the progress and application of science. Nowadays, most homes possess electric lighting and cooking, but many also have washing machines, vacuum cleaners and kitchen appliances, all designed to increase comfort and cleanliness and reduce drudgery. Science produces the fan which cools the air, the machinery which makes the furniture and fabrics, and hundred and one other features for good living. The books and papers are at school, and again everything from the piece of chalk to the closed-circuit television of instruction are the direct or indirect results of scientific progress. Learning is therefore easier. And clerical work is made far more speedy and efficient by the office typewriter, quite apart from the hundreds of different machines which relieve the manual worker of so much slow and monotonous toil in the factories. The first and the major advantage is that medical science is very progressive and vastly available. Without the needed technology a lot of people would struggle with their health. More complicated treatments are being carried out successfully, by means of science and technology. These include surgeries, heart and kidney transplant, artificial inseminations and many others. These treatments are saving many innocent lives. The point is to spread it, and reach with medicine help to the poor nations of the Third World. Again, advanced technology improves industry by making it more effective and, what is vital today, safer for environment. Modern technology has introduced various sophisticated machines into our industries which is increasing productivity at a very fast rate. Work that required technological advancements have made the world a smaller place to live in Dissemination : whether spreading  information, broadcasting news, or sharing knowledge, technology has made it faster, easier, and smarter. Education Disadvantage  with the new science and technology developments most people underestimate the damage it gives us. First of all, I would like to say, that with these new science and technical appliances people became to be lazy. They rarely go out to work on foot or by a bicycle. Now there are a lot of modern cars in the cities, which are said to be emitting less gas. But still their emitted gasses damage the environment, so to my mind, that is why pollution of our environment is increasing. Secondly, it seems to me, that technologies are throwing away our free time. For example, these new laptop computer or those touch-screen devices are full of entertaining programs, which are attracting people effectively. Then people forget how to communicate with others in real life, not through international communication systems like â€Å"Skype† or â€Å"Facebook†.

Complex Relationship between the American and Jig in Hemingway’s Hills

The Complex Relationship between the American and Jig in Ernest Hemingway’s â€Å"Hills Like White Elephants† In Hemingway’s â€Å"Hills Like White Elephants†, the American and Jig are like the tracks at the train station, they can never meet. While Jig represents fertility, life and continuity, the American represents sterility, dryness and death. Unfortunately, Jig depends emotionally on the American – as many women depended on their male counterparts in the 1940s – and lacks the autonomy and willpower required to openly affirm herself in their relationship. As they struggle to find common ground, the very discussion that can bring them together only tears them apart. The differences in each character – in their personality, means of communication and desires – truly emphasize the constant opposition that burns between them, this very opposition leads to the couple’s inevitable separation, as Jig discovers herself and her independence through the dilemma at hand. The ubiquitous conflict between the American and Jig is underlined by the tremendous differences in their personality, communication methods and desires. In the beginning, the environment seems relaxed, neither, the American nor Jig, is speaking. Jig is looking out at the scenery that is â€Å"brown and dry† (paragraph 8) – like their relationship – as the American orders drinks. Unlike the American who is disconnected, Jig seems to be imaginative, intuitive and connected with her world, while she gazes out the window, she remarks that the hills â€Å"look like white elephants† (paragraph 9). At this point, she seems to have something on her mind: white elephants are believed to be rare and precious, although they require much upkeep, commitment and sacrifice, e... ...g and the American is what eventually tears them apart, they have different needs and desires and this, in turn, allows Jig to discover her independence, despite the difficult choice she faces. After having weighed everything, Jig would have probably had the abortion. Regardless of whether she leaves the American or remains forever unhappy with him, Jig’s decision is made: she takes a final stance and acknowledges – in an ironic tone – â€Å"I feel fine†¦ there’s nothing wrong with me. I feel fine† (paragraph 110). The question of self-affirmation has been solved here, as she looks to her own self, her own happiness and her own will to look at things as they are. WORKS CITED Hemingway, Ernest. â€Å"Hills Like White Elephants†. Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing. Ed. Edgar V. Roberts. 4th Compact Ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008. 290-293.

Amy Winehouse and Adele Contrast/ Comparison

Amy Winehouse and Adele are the two Englishwomen that have dominated   the UK music industry in the past few years and their impact on the global scene has made them equally memorable and inspiring. They stamped British music forever through their vintage looks but more so through their powerful voices and distinct genres. Winehouse and Adele are both white girls who owe a debt to black soul music.The distinction between them is emphasized more so through their best works, the albums ( Winehouse's † Back to Black† and Adele's † 19†³) that forever transitioned them from London's Brit art school performers(where they were alumni)to successful artists. Without a doubt, the albums these artists created are considered great achievements of our era and the most complex masterpieces of our time. They reflect these ladies' heartbreak due to failed relationships through a mesmerizing but rich sound topped by a distinct musical and lyrical style.Adele's album is simple and clean, less menacing whereas Amy's is a little slight more edgy and memorable. The album â€Å"19† encompasses a bright acoustic-guitar chime, with a lullaby twinkle of plush strings and Adele's mesmerizing  singing tone, honest lyrics, jazz and soul influences evokes Amy's. Adele's delivery is accomplished through a more delicate bluesy tone whereas Amy's is represented by a brick house jazzy expressiveness far beyond our time. Adele is simpler lyrically and occasionally even soppy and somehow redundant lyrically, she doesn't have the mature poetic heritage that Amy does.Talented writers and composers these two muses beautifully show through their lyrics a deep attachment to the lost love and the disappointments that follow its course. â€Å"Back to Black† sounds emotionally and musically true. All eleven songs seem like great lost classics from the 60s : â€Å"Rehab†Ã‚  has many shades of Motown and contemporary twists, â€Å"Me and Mr. Jones† be longs to the swing era of the 60s and   Ã¢â‚¬Å"Loving Is A Losing Game† is a stunning soul ballad with a vintage finish.Winehouse's songs are snappily written with a mix of bitterly caustic lyrics and finger popping tunes, then delivered in a voice that alternates sexy smouldering with dismissive contempt. In the song  Ã¢â‚¬Å"You know I'm No Good†, she's unapologetic about her unfaithfulness but she can also be witty, as on â€Å"Me & Mrs Jones† when she berates a boyfriend with â€Å"You made me miss the Slick Rick gig†. Some will find Adele rigidly old-fashioned with influences (Etta James, Billie Holiday) from another age and her album truly shows that forgotten era.Amy's   influence of girl groups from the 50s   and early 60s is plain: plinky keyboards, parpy brass, trebly guitar. A cursory listen to† 19†³may lead us to conclude that Adele has not just a voice but an appearance way in excess of her years. The same can be said about Wi nehouse except she's   more daring not just appearance wise but vocally and   lyrically as well and through her writings she evokes more depth. The music poures out of Amy a stream of weathered, seasoned phrases, seemingly without effort and â€Å"Back to Black†, is a more soulful and stripped album than Adele's.Strong one moment then fragile the next, † 19†³   is an album that is dominated by highlights dripping with beauty and class. On the other hand   Ã¢â‚¬Å"Back to Black† is flawless and classic and represents the artist's true masterpiece. It's not that â€Å"Back to Black† is better as an overall album but besides being a door opener for many artists its appearance  on the British scene was necessary so we can have Adele's â€Å"19†. British singer Adele has credited Winehouse's success in the USA and more so for making her journey smoother. Winehouse reacquainted an audience with a long forgotten genre by overcoming the vintage aspect.After the release of â€Å"Back to Black†, record companies sought out artists with a similar sound but also fearless and experimental female musicians. Winehouse revitalized   British music forever and influenced British female artists like Adele, Duffy, Emeli   Sande, Misha B. , Jessie J. , Paloma Faith and Florence Welch. These musicians can all be traced back to Winehouse in terms of attitude, musical styles and fashion. Adele's voice caresses and inspires and she sings with unabashed passion about a kind of pain we can all recognize.Amy's voice on the other side is full of soul and characterized by a sultry sound and she delivers amazingly strong and timeless performances that once heard can never be forgotten. Songs like † Me and Mr. Jones† and â€Å"Tears Dry On Their Own† really show her capability to seamlessly go from soul to jazz and back to soul all the while evoking that spirit that is essential in emphasizing her sophisticated and thrilling musical style. Different as they seem – in the way they evolved musically and vocally- these two divas have much in common.Under everything else they both achieved success at an early age through their mutual passion for music and their indisputable talent. Their originality and soulful mannerism is clearly evoked in their albums. Amy and Adele didn't just pave the road for new British artists but have beautifully   reinstated   love as a main theme of our musical era through their deep songs. Two Grammy winners, with retro contemporary sounds they had forever changed people's   outlook on music and will remain the most acclaimed musical game changers of our century. Amy Winehouse and Adele Contrast/ Comparison Amy Winehouse and Adele are the two Englishwomen that have dominated   the UK music industry in the past few years and their impact on the global scene has made them equally memorable and inspiring. They stamped British music forever through their vintage looks but more so through their powerful voices and distinct genres. Winehouse and Adele are both white girls who owe a debt to black soul music.The distinction between them is emphasized more so through their best works, the albums ( Winehouse's † Back to Black† and Adele's † 19†³) that forever transitioned them from London's Brit art school performers(where they were alumni)to successful artists. Without a doubt, the albums these artists created are considered great achievements of our era and the most complex masterpieces of our time. They reflect these ladies' heartbreak due to failed relationships through a mesmerizing but rich sound topped by a distinct musical and lyrical style.Adele's album is simple and clean, less menacing whereas Amy's is a little slight more edgy and memorable. The album â€Å"19† encompasses a bright acoustic-guitar chime, with a lullaby twinkle of plush strings and Adele's mesmerizing  singing tone, honest lyrics, jazz and soul influences evokes Amy's. Adele's delivery is accomplished through a more delicate bluesy tone whereas Amy's is represented by a brick house jazzy expressiveness far beyond our time. Adele is simpler lyrically and occasionally even soppy and somehow redundant lyrically, she doesn't have the mature poetic heritage that Amy does.Talented writers and composers these two muses beautifully show through their lyrics a deep attachment to the lost love and the disappointments that follow its course. â€Å"Back to Black† sounds emotionally and musically true. All eleven songs seem like great lost classics from the 60s : â€Å"Rehab†Ã‚  has many shades of Motown and contemporary twists, â€Å"Me and Mr. Jones† be longs to the swing era of the 60s and   Ã¢â‚¬Å"Loving Is A Losing Game† is a stunning soul ballad with a vintage finish.Winehouse's songs are snappily written with a mix of bitterly caustic lyrics and finger popping tunes, then delivered in a voice that alternates sexy smouldering with dismissive contempt. In the song  Ã¢â‚¬Å"You know I'm No Good†, she's unapologetic about her unfaithfulness but she can also be witty, as on â€Å"Me & Mrs Jones† when she berates a boyfriend with â€Å"You made me miss the Slick Rick gig†. Some will find Adele rigidly old-fashioned with influences (Etta James, Billie Holiday) from another age and her album truly shows that forgotten era.Amy's   influence of girl groups from the 50s   and early 60s is plain: plinky keyboards, parpy brass, trebly guitar. A cursory listen to† 19†³may lead us to conclude that Adele has not just a voice but an appearance way in excess of her years. The same can be said about Wi nehouse except she's   more daring not just appearance wise but vocally and   lyrically as well and through her writings she evokes more depth. The music poures out of Amy a stream of weathered, seasoned phrases, seemingly without effort and â€Å"Back to Black†, is a more soulful and stripped album than Adele's.Strong one moment then fragile the next, † 19†³   is an album that is dominated by highlights dripping with beauty and class. On the other hand   Ã¢â‚¬Å"Back to Black† is flawless and classic and represents the artist's true masterpiece. It's not that â€Å"Back to Black† is better as an overall album but besides being a door opener for many artists its appearance  on the British scene was necessary so we can have Adele's â€Å"19†. British singer Adele has credited Winehouse's success in the USA and more so for making her journey smoother. Winehouse reacquainted an audience with a long forgotten genre by overcoming the vintage aspect.After the release of â€Å"Back to Black†, record companies sought out artists with a similar sound but also fearless and experimental female musicians. Winehouse revitalized   British music forever and influenced British female artists like Adele, Duffy, Emeli   Sande, Misha B. , Jessie J. , Paloma Faith and Florence Welch. These musicians can all be traced back to Winehouse in terms of attitude, musical styles and fashion. Adele's voice caresses and inspires and she sings with unabashed passion about a kind of pain we can all recognize.Amy's voice on the other side is full of soul and characterized by a sultry sound and she delivers amazingly strong and timeless performances that once heard can never be forgotten. Songs like † Me and Mr. Jones† and â€Å"Tears Dry On Their Own† really show her capability to seamlessly go from soul to jazz and back to soul all the while evoking that spirit that is essential in emphasizing her sophisticated and thrilling musical style. Different as they seem – in the way they evolved musically and vocally- these two divas have much in common.Under everything else they both achieved success at an early age through their mutual passion for music and their indisputable talent. Their originality and soulful mannerism is clearly evoked in their albums. Amy and Adele didn't just pave the road for new British artists but have beautifully   reinstated   love as a main theme of our musical era through their deep songs. Two Grammy winners, with retro contemporary sounds they had forever changed people's   outlook on music and will remain the most acclaimed musical game changers of our century.

The Political System Of Rome - 3307 Words

Through the forging of alliances and also conquering by invasion Rome grew from the city itself to encompass much of its surrounding lands; including those around the Mediterranean, France, Spain, the Italian Peninsula, Africa and Greece.This expansion meant that Rome was often engaging in confrontation, some of them nearly caused Rome to fall for example the Battle with the Carthaginians – the city of Carthage was defeated and destroyed by the third Punic war, after Rome took over the province of Carthage the other lands followed. By 272 BC it is estimated that Rome had around 150,000 inhabitants. This growth hosted issues for Rome’s political system – they found it difficult to run their provinces as their number increased, social unrest was born out of this and tensions arose between the classes. The Republican political system became weaker with time as the gap between the wealthy and the poor grew, the wealthy were Greedy and the governing bodies became corr upt. A tribune of the plebs was a position of someone who could intervene in legal matters on behalf of the plebs, Tiberius Gracchus was an individual who gained election to become a plebeian tribune and he represented the concerns of the poor. He sought to reduce the tensions between classes and gained public support, the senate saw this as a grab for power and so he was assassinated; this caused Gaius Gracchus to carry on with his late brothers’ work for a time until he also met the same fate. Social, economic andShow MoreRelatedMauryan/Gupta India vs. Imperial Rome Methods of Political Control755 Words   |  4 PagesCompare/Contrast Essay: Mauryan/Gupta India and Imperial Rome methods of political control Gupta India (320 B.C.E-550 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) both had very distinctive methods of political control based on everything from cultural reasons to geographic limitations. Many factors were present affecting the similarities and differences between the two. To begin, unity was difficult in India due to its geography which created a separation of sorts. However, it did makeRead MoreHan China Essay858 Words   |  4 PagesImperial Rome and Han China had parallels and differences in methods of political control. The two civilizations both used the aspects of religion and belief systems to attain political influence over their subjects, but had differing methods to reach this goal. Standardization and cultural unity was a key factor in both civilizations regarding political control, as was expansion and growth of trade. The systems of belief of both Han China and Imperial Rome were quite different. Rome began withRead MoreThe Fall and Rise of the Roman Empire Essay637 Words   |  3 PagesHow powerful the Roman Empire was! Rome the ultimate country of its time slowly declined and vanished from our world. After starting with a small settlement off the Tiber River in Italy Rome expanded its borders and claimed territory around the entire Mediterranean and more. Rome also lasted for over a thousand years elapsing over late B.C.E and early C.E. In spite of all that, Rome was far from perfect. This powerful state was brought to its collapse through challenges that would be cataclysmicRead MoreGreek And Roman Civilizations : Greece And Ancient Civilizations1503 Words   |  7 Pagesinfluence are Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. These two civilizations would eventually come to shape much of what would become the modern European culture, politics and society, and by extension, a vast proportion of globa l culture and society. In scrutinizing the trajectory of modern history in an era of globalization of Western ideas and modes of living, the importance of these civilizations in world history is extensive, contributing to cultural, political and social trends which may well dominateRead MoreDifferences in Ancient Rome and Han China944 Words   |  4 PagesHan China and Classical Rome When comparing Han China and Classical Rome, many political, geographical, and religious similarities can be found, though many differences are also prevalent. Though Roman and Han political structures both emphasized bureaucracies, they came to them quite differently. Through copious amounts of expansion, both societies spread culture and earned money, though expansion was eventually their downfalls. Their religions differed immensely, with Rome emphasizing polytheismRead MoreThe Real History Behind Rome: Julius Caesar Essay815 Words   |  4 Pages Rome, the subject of this report is Rome. The (completely wacko made-up) legend says that Rome was founded by Romulus and Remus, the twin sons of Mars, the god of war. Supposedly some king tossed them into a basket, chucked them into the Tiber River, and left them to die a good old-fashioned baby-river-drowning-death. Apparently this never happened because they were rescued by a she-wolf and raised as one of her own. Eventually Romulus and Remus decided to ice that king and overthrow the kingdomRead MoreGreek And Roman Civilizations : Greece And Ancient Civilizations1498 Words   |  6 Pagesinfluence are Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. These two civilizations would eventually come to shape much of what would become the modern European culture, politics and society, and by extension, a vast proportion of global culture and society. In examining the trajectory of modern history in an era of globalization of Western ideas and modes of living, the importance of these civilizations in world history is extensive, contributing to cultural, political and social trends which may well dominateRead MoreClassical Rome And Classical Greece1498 Words   |  6 Pagesmainly Classical Rome and Classical Greece. Even though Greece had a tremendous influence over our civilization, out of these two classical civilizations, I believe that Classical Rome has had a bigger impact on many aspects of the contemporary United States. In this essay, I am going to examine the political system, economic system, and the architecture of the Classical Rome Empire, and explain how these influenced the contemporary United States. The political system of Classical Rome was the baseRead MoreThe Roman And Greek Political Systems1510 Words   |  7 PagesThe Roman and Greek political systems have influenced the governments across the globe today, and have even introduced political words such as democracy, monarchy, and tyranny. However, Rome was influenced by the Greek, they introduced a republic view seen today then the democracy of Greek city-states. During the time of these two civilizations, they held many overlapping similarities, and other times showing the vast difference between the related civilizations such as the location of each city-stateRead MoreRoman Vs. Democratic Ideals Essay1453 Words   |  6 Pagesthe discussion over its system of government. Many later states would emphasis their influence stemming from Rome, such as the case seen within the republican and democratic ideals key to post-revolutionary France. This raises an important question about Roman government itself, was it actually th e inklings of a democracy? Historians, such as Ronald Syme, have made the argument that the glimpses seen of democracy in ancient Rome are little more than an illusion hiding a system of elite control. This

Buddhism A Form Of Radical Empiricism - 2329 Words

The KÄ lÄ ma Sutta is being used as a means by many skeptics and rationalist to denounce hearing, tradition, scripture, and faith. They support their arguments by citing the passage that the Buddha given to the perplexed KÄ lÄ mas. â€Å"Come, KÄ lÄ mas. Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing, †¦tradition, †¦rumor, †¦scripture, ...surmise, †¦axiom, †¦specious reasoning, †¦bias towards a notion pondered over, †¦another’s seeming ability, nor upon the consideration ‘The monk is our teacher.’ When you yourselves know†¦Ã¢â‚¬  In the book Encountering Buddhism edited by Seth Robert Segal is found to only cited this passage and having stated that, â€Å"Buddhism is a form of radical empiricism. The Buddha taught that one should not to take his word on†¦show more content†¦However, he insisted that: The KÄ lÄ ma Sutta explicitly rejected the transmitted tradition. Instead, Buddhists are exhorted â€Å"to know for themselves,† that is, to derive authority from their own experiences. In other words, experiential authority based on the individual is privileged over and against scriptural or textual authority. The KÄ lÄ ma Sutta was really criticizing heretical beliefs as false sources of religious authority deriving from â€Å"hearsay† and charismatic authority, and further highlights the problems of relying solely on â€Å"repeated hearing,† â€Å"tradition,† and â€Å"scripture,† all of which must be understood as references to Vedic and Brahmanical understanding of religious authority. On counter wise, Zhiru claims this discourse â€Å"argues for the authority of individual experience and realization of truth over transmitted teachings.† And it is â€Å"explicit prioritization of personal experience over transmitted text as the source of religious authority†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Is this true? Because the Buddha never seem says thus in the

The Differences Between Architects Le Corbusier And Laurie...

How Do Concerns Such As Sustainability And Climate Change Relate To A Contemporary Visual Culture? Formally Analyse The Difference Between Architects Le Corbusier And Laurie Baker In Conjunction With The Required Readings. Jason Mikha Student Number: 27004791 Art and design theory C December 2015 This essay will discuss the differences between the two architects, Le Corbusier and Laurie Baker and how concerns such as sustainability and climate change relates to contemporary visual culture. Le Corbusier was born in Switzerland on October 6th, 1887 and died in France on August 27th, 1965. Corbusier was known for his minimalist designs and theoretical implementations to his designs. Corbusier uses what he titles it to be the â€Å"five points of a new architecture† and in these points, it is clear to see that Corbusier prioritises aesthetics over function. Laurie Baker was born in England on March 2nd, 1917 and died in India on April 1st, 2007. Baker looked at both technical and aesthetic qualities equally and did not prioritise in one. Baker constantly considers the way to provide an eco-friendly way to produce something whereas Corbusier’s designs involved heavy machinery which produces negative contributions to the environment. This essay mainly use the recour ses, Architecture of rural housing: some issues in India by Romi Khosla, Le Corbusier’s Ruins: The Changing Face of Chandigarh’s Capitol by Vinayak Bharne, and A contemporary city by Le Corbusier. Baker’s

Duties of a Citizen Free Essays

Recently you wonaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t be seeing an American citizen care much about anything other than them selves. Their main priority is to ensure the perfection of their own lives. That is not being a good citizen though. We will write a custom essay sample on Duties of a Citizen or any similar topic only for you Order Now Making sure your needs are met before you look up and see what you can help with is corrupt and selfish. We need to care more about how we can help our country and what we need to do to be a good citizen. Having clear goals, consistent ideals, and unity is what makes a country powerful; so when any of these components are lacking, a country and its citizens will weaken, which is happening in America. Being a citizen of America has become virtually insignificant to our people, and is now crippling us. These three components depend upon one another to ensure the strength of a country. We must value all these elements to check our loyalty for our countries endeavors. Specifically the ideals should be based on the standards your country wants, since it is the structure to your countryaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s government. But ideals consist of what you and your country should value in your beliefs, ethics, and principals so the people can jointly support their country. Our ideals (especially American) have been accepted by each subsequent generation until recently. Unity is a common understanding and belief within a group of people; it is joining together for an ultimate cause. Goals are the start of our countries ambition to aim for our desired result and produce the product of our efforts. The ideals however establish a consensus on what we value or believe in as a country, it creates boundaries on our moral standard. We have to stay true to our constitution and the morals that were founded with it. To stray off and feel superior to your own ideals is no exception. That is what breaks the core and ruins our countries long lasting policies. Being a country of the people, for everything from the military to the government to the public should be equally united in the same goals. The government however is the power that should listen then voice the verdict of our decisions. They should act upon the publicaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s best interests, and not single out any party or group whose stance on a matter should be determined as any less significant. If a decision is detrimental to anyoneaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s life in the general public, then it is likely there will be more than one person affected by the same things. The government should act upon their doings with precision and a conscious understanding of their impact on everyone. Dependant on the necessity of their actions an act should not be passed if it is going to exclude even a minority in the populations opinions. With this we can determine clear goal sets and be unified. When going through with anything you should always check your tracks to see if you stomped on any bugs. Through out the Vietnam War these ingredients were missing for the American position. It doesnaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t matter if the opponent is right or wrong, but if you are following these tactics, you will be successful. Ho Chi Minh and his communist following was ensuing power through authority and fear. Due to the fear he was possessing in many of the Vietnamese civilians, he was able to create unity for the goal sets he was trying to reach. His methods consisted of using fear over his people to squeeze out the product he desired. Once the people saw the product he achieved by communist ideals, Minh created a massive following of communist believers to ensure the continuation of reaching their goals and his regime. He established groups such as the NLF to spread his ideals and expand his following, but also to support all sections of his military. They believed that aâ‚ ¬? as long as they did not lose, they won. aâ‚ ¬? Americans on the other hand should have seen their defeat coming. Constantly reflecting on the Korean War as aâ‚ ¬? learning our lesson,aâ‚ ¬? we should have taken the French defeat in Dien Bien Phu as a warning. Americans entered the war, head first with no structure of unity, goal sets, or ideals. Events such as the Tet Offensive had not only initiated a new phase of the war but also showed us that our unity was weak. The US, if unified would have been smarter to not abandon all their cities and create opportunity for the NLF and Vietcong to strike. We would have communicated and sorted our priorities to know our goals before separating into remote areas. Other battles like Ia Drang showed the issues with unity and goals that have become noticed because of the failure to succeed in communication during them. The Pentagon Papers along with some accumulating underground news articles revealed much of what went wrong to the public in 1971. When the Americans had already initiated Vietnamization it was to late to change our strategy for the war effort. The papers caused discourse within our own country and distrust of our government. They were one of the large breaking points to all the built up distress over the war. In the papers we lied about the Gulf of Tokin aâ‚ ¬? attackaâ‚ ¬? and covered up our faults to our own people. Events such as My Lai concerning Lieutenant William Calley posed even more issues on the moral justification we had in Vietnam, for such things as our aâ‚ ¬? Free Fire Policyaâ‚ ¬? or aâ‚ ¬? Search and Destroy Campaign. aâ‚ ¬? It showed that Americans went against their own ideals when in Vietnam by not treating the Vietnamese with equal liberties, as we would give ourselves. It seemed as though we held a higher standing for ourselves when in Vietnam so we did not follow our own belief of treating all humans as equals. Killing innocent civilians without trial, not accepting the cultural difference of nations, using the threat of arms as a bribe to follow our beliefs, treating foreigners with out equality, ect. It was all that went wrong in our approach to try and gain the Vietnamese trust. When we went over to Vietnam we showed, a third world country in despair, a country that does not constitute itself by the ideals we arrived there with. In fact we did the exact things we were fighting against and did what we originally founded ourselves to not become, in Vietnam. It was a hypocritical scenario where we couldnaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t learn from our mistakes until we were gone and had already lost. In present day Afghan/ Iraq with many of those mistakes from Vietnam still hanging over our heads, we are now pushing to fix. Since Vietnam we have initiated the Special Operations Unit, and founded many other sections of the Military to ensure we donaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t make those same mistakes. Although many things are still missing from our strategy, such as going against our ideals again in the case of Abu Ghraib, we have come a long way. A friend of mine, Richard Bennett, currently serving in the US Special Opps. Group, and waiting to be deported to Afghan/ Iraq is anxious to utilize his training. His job will be to train civilians on how to protect and sustain their own government, so they can stand on their own. He has gone through rigorous training to ensure his capability in every situation but as his mother said to me in her interview, aâ‚ ¬? Richie is anxious to be deported and utilize his trainingaâ‚ ¬Ã‚ ¦ but he has expressed his frustrations with the politics concerning the waraâ‚ ¬Ã‚ ¦ like I said, it is the Age of Information, so you can see multiple sides to every story now. aâ‚ ¬? Essentially her point was to express that even if there is corruption in Afghan/ Iraq there is practically nothing the public cant obtain information on. The publicaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s judgment on the issues should be heard and taken into consideration by the government to change what they feel is not right based on our ideals. Finally, when analyzing the trends and mistakes we made in Vietnam there is significant improvement of our structure in Afghanistan/ Iraq now. Even though we still have our defects as citizens, we should always remember the three components to being successful as a country and as a citizen of that country. The unity, goals, and ideals of a country found their infrastructure. So to be a good citizen you have to work to maintain that, for your country, and for the future of your country. How to cite Duties of a Citizen, Essay examples